<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The ludicracy that is software patents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2006/02/23/the-ludicracy-that-is-software-patents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2006/02/23/the-ludicracy-that-is-software-patents/</link>
	<description>Flash Platform Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 21:31:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristof</title>
		<link>http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2006/02/23/the-ludicracy-that-is-software-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-9235</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 13:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2006/02/23/the-ludicracy-that-is-software-patents/#comment-9235</guid>
		<description>http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;d=PALL&amp;p=1&amp;u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;s1=6,727,830.WKU.&amp;OS=PN/6,727,830&amp;RS=PN/6,727,830</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&#038;Sect2=HITOFF&#038;d=PALL&#038;p=1&#038;u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&#038;r=1&#038;f=G&#038;l=50&#038;s1=6,727,830.WKU.&#038;OS=PN/6,727,830&#038;RS=PN/6,727,830" rel="nofollow">http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&#038;Sect2=HITOFF&#038;d=PALL&#038;p=1&#038;u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&#038;r=1&#038;f=G&#038;l=50&#038;s1=6,727,830.WKU.&#038;OS=PN/6,727,830&#038;RS=PN/6,727,830</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristof</title>
		<link>http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2006/02/23/the-ludicracy-that-is-software-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-9234</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 13:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2006/02/23/the-ludicracy-that-is-software-patents/#comment-9234</guid>
		<description>If I&#039;m not mistake, double-clicking was patented a long time ago. So were the hyperlinks ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m not mistake, double-clicking was patented a long time ago. So were the hyperlinks &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario Klingemann</title>
		<link>http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2006/02/23/the-ludicracy-that-is-software-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-9047</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Klingemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2006/02/23/the-ludicracy-that-is-software-patents/#comment-9047</guid>
		<description>Well, how will it be written in the Encyclopedia Galactica from 2200? &quot;The guys from the US patent office were among first ones against the wall when the revolution finally came.&quot; This is so ridiculous it really hurts. This system is severely flawed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, how will it be written in the Encyclopedia Galactica from 2200? &#8220;The guys from the US patent office were among first ones against the wall when the revolution finally came.&#8221; This is so ridiculous it really hurts. This system is severely flawed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeh</title>
		<link>http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2006/02/23/the-ludicracy-that-is-software-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-9042</link>
		<dc:creator>zeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2006/02/23/the-ludicracy-that-is-software-patents/#comment-9042</guid>
		<description>If I remember well, double-clicking has been patented a few years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I remember well, double-clicking has been patented a few years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander McCabe</title>
		<link>http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2006/02/23/the-ludicracy-that-is-software-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-9041</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander McCabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2006/02/23/the-ludicracy-that-is-software-patents/#comment-9041</guid>
		<description>I agree, these patents are getting out of control. As a small ISV (independent software vendor), I&#039;d rather see stronger controls for the copyright of software rather than patent protection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, these patents are getting out of control. As a small ISV (independent software vendor), I&#8217;d rather see stronger controls for the copyright of software rather than patent protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

