<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe MAX Barcelona &#8211; session reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2007/10/21/adobe-max-barcelona-session-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2007/10/21/adobe-max-barcelona-session-reviews/</link>
	<description>Founding Partner - Project Cocoon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:46:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leo Schuman</title>
		<link>http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2007/10/21/adobe-max-barcelona-session-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-16457</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Schuman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 01:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterelst.com/blog/2007/10/21/adobe-max-barcelona-session-reviews/#comment-16457</guid>
		<description>Hey Peter, I appreciate the feedback about how my design patterns preso was categorized.

It was an organizational mistake that the session was labeled &quot;advanced&quot; in Barcelona.  At MAX in Chicago it was labeled as &quot;intermediate&quot; as I&#039;d intended when I wrote it, which was certainly closer to the mark (it&#039;s all relative to audience ... we&#039;ve got a very diverse audience in terms of skills and focus).  The goal was to introduce design pattern use to developers who&#039;ve just gotten their feet wet with basic OOP in AS3 (which is a lot of folks), and are ready to go deeper with it.  Fortunately, about 75% of the attendees evaluated the session as being on the mark (for them) and helpful.  Unfortunately, this left 25% disappointed, like yourself, because the coverage was indeed basic for those already exposed to and using design patterns.

I&#039;ll certainly be much more aware of how my sessions are being categorized in the future, and I definitely agree this topic calls for both &quot;intro&quot; and truly advanced discussion.  I&#039;ll doing what I can to make it happen.  We&#039;ve all got an amazing platform and developer community to nurture and grow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Peter, I appreciate the feedback about how my design patterns preso was categorized.</p>
<p>It was an organizational mistake that the session was labeled &#8220;advanced&#8221; in Barcelona.  At MAX in Chicago it was labeled as &#8220;intermediate&#8221; as I&#8217;d intended when I wrote it, which was certainly closer to the mark (it&#8217;s all relative to audience &#8230; we&#8217;ve got a very diverse audience in terms of skills and focus).  The goal was to introduce design pattern use to developers who&#8217;ve just gotten their feet wet with basic OOP in AS3 (which is a lot of folks), and are ready to go deeper with it.  Fortunately, about 75% of the attendees evaluated the session as being on the mark (for them) and helpful.  Unfortunately, this left 25% disappointed, like yourself, because the coverage was indeed basic for those already exposed to and using design patterns.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll certainly be much more aware of how my sessions are being categorized in the future, and I definitely agree this topic calls for both &#8220;intro&#8221; and truly advanced discussion.  I&#8217;ll doing what I can to make it happen.  We&#8217;ve all got an amazing platform and developer community to nurture and grow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
